Law
CBI false statement case explained: Timeline from 2016
The Delhi High Court has directed criminal complaint proceedings against six CBI officers after finding that the agency’s 2016 reply to a trial court contained a materially false assertion, while clarifying that its order is not a finding of guilt.
January 2016: the High Court held the sanction for prosecution invalid, and the officer was discharged.
June 2016: the Law Ministry gave an opinion that there was no reasonable ground to pursue the matter.
July 1, 2016: the opinion was communicated to the CBI through the DoPT.
August 2, 2016: the CBI told the trial court that correspondence was under way.
October 6, 2026: the High Court directed complaint proceedings against six officers.
The case arose from CBI proceedings against a former Indian Revenue Service officer in a disproportionate assets case.
In January 2016, the High Court held the sanction for the officer’s prosecution invalid, and the officer was discharged.
In June 2016, the Ministry of Law and Justice gave an opinion that there appeared to be no reasonable ground to pursue the matter before a higher forum.
The opinion was communicated to the CBI through the Department of Personnel and Training on July 1, 2016.
The court examined successive drafts of the CBI’s reply.
An earlier draft said that the Department of Personnel and Training had rejected the appeal proposal, and that text was deleted and replaced with handwritten words saying correspondence was under way.
The court said this was not mere imprecise wording, and that there was a reasonable foundation for the allegations, according to Bar and Bench.
The court said there was a reasonable foundation for offences under Sections 191, 193 and 209 of the Indian Penal Code.
Section 191 deals with giving false evidence, Section 193 with punishment for false evidence, and Section 209 with a dishonest false claim in court.
The Special Judge, CBI, has been directed to file a written complaint against the six officers with the jurisdictional Magistrate within four weeks.
The six officers include the then inspector of the case, and this report does not name them because the court has not found them guilty.
Court gavel (representative image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Law
Delhi women’s safety: What changes after the Supreme Court order
The Supreme Court told the Centre and Delhi Police on October 5 to ensure that every woman in the capital feels safe, directing dedicated police teams in each district, better patrols and an audit of lighting and CCTV.
Delhi’s districts are to have dedicated police teams led by DSP-rank officers.
Patrols in the evening and early morning are to be strengthened.
Lighting and CCTV at public places are to be audited and repaired.
The court is monitoring progress through reports.
The order came on October 5.
The court wants offenders to feel fear, and it said men should fear committing sexual offences.
The court directed each Delhi district to set up a dedicated police team led by an officer of Deputy Superintendent of Police rank.
Police are to map vulnerable locations, including parks, transport hubs and isolated areas.
Evening and early-morning patrols are to be strengthened.
Authorities must audit lighting and CCTV at public parks, metro stations, bus stops and other vulnerable places, and repair or strengthen them where needed.
The court also pointed to the use of the National Database on Sexual Offenders and emergency response systems.
LatestLY reported that the court emphasised 24-hour monitoring cells to prevent sexual offences.
The bench said that inadequate lighting, poor surveillance and lax patrolling create conditions in which crimes against women can occur.
It said authorities must act on the ground and not rely on paperwork.
The matter remains under the court’s monitoring, and authorities will have to file progress reports showing the action taken.
A suo motu case is one that the court takes up on its own, without a petition from a party.
The Centre and Delhi Police are the respondents in the case, because Delhi Police reports to the Union Home Ministry.
Outlook, the Free Press Journal, IBTimes India and The Logical Indian reported the hearing.
The reports on the hearing did not name any victim or accused.
A bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran heard a suo motu case on women’s safety in Delhi on Monday, October 5, 2026.
Connaught Place, New Delhi at night (file image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
INDIA bloc march: What happened after the FIR
CBI false statement case explained: Timeline from 2016
Why Delhi feels Himalayan earthquakes: Chamoli tremor explained
Redfox Overseas: Customize Your Own Energy Drink and Stand Out in the Market
Zamzam Company CEO Chhote Bhai-Bade Bhai gave a grand welcome to Indian writer Devhari Sirvi in Dubai
Shikha Sharma: The Fashion Journalist, Blogger, and Plus-Size Model Taking the Industry by Storm
-
Brandpost2 years agoRedfox Overseas: Customize Your Own Energy Drink and Stand Out in the Market
-
Brandpost2 years agoZamzam Company CEO Chhote Bhai-Bade Bhai gave a grand welcome to Indian writer Devhari Sirvi in Dubai
-
Fashion2 years agoShikha Sharma: The Fashion Journalist, Blogger, and Plus-Size Model Taking the Industry by Storm
-
Entertainment2 years ago
Lucky Roxx’s “Yadav Ki Pukar” Goes Viral! Youth Celebrate Unity & Power
-
Entertainment9 years agoNew Season 8 Walking Dead trailer flashes forward in time
-
Entertainment9 years ago
Meet Superman’s grandfather in new trailer for Krypton
-
Uncategorized2 years ago
Hello world!
-
Brandpost2 years agoFrom Local Hero to National Icon: Satyam Yadav’s Journey with TwentyOne