EDITION: IN English हिंदी Friday, 30 October 2026
TRENDING Stock MarketNarendra ModiNiftySensexGurumaa Yogita KhatriAndhra PradeshCyclone ArnabFranchise India 2026 MumbaiIIT Roorkee alumni entrepreneurs
Law

Contempt of court explained: What the Metro plea asks the Supreme Court to decide

The Supreme Court will hear a contempt plea on Sunday, October 11, alleging that Delhi Metro stations were kept closed on October 10 despite its October 9 order against a complete prohibition of Metro and train movement.

By Dailyviewer Published: · 2 min read
Contempt of court explained: What the Metro plea asks the Supreme Court to decide
Supreme Court of India (file image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

A contempt petition alleges that a court’s order was knowingly disobeyed.

The plea says that the court’s October 9 order against a complete Metro prohibition was not followed.

The court will decide whether there was wilful disobedience.

The authorities had defended the measures as meant to maintain law and order.

The hearing is on Sunday.

The bench will be of Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana.

The plea has been filed by Shailendra Mani Tripathi through advocate Chand Qureshi.

It names Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan and other authorities as respondents.

It accuses the Delhi Metro, Delhi Police and the Union government of deliberate disregard of the court’s orders.

The plea relies on the order passed on Friday, October 9, by a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana.

That order directed that there be no complete prohibition on the movement of Metro and train services into Delhi on October 10.

The bench observed that the notifications appeared to overreach, and that a total prohibition is different from regulation of transport.

The plea says that Metro stations in Delhi were kept closed despite that direction.

Authorities closed 45 stations from 9 pm on Friday until 6 pm on Saturday for security reasons, according to an advisory cited in the plea.

The plea seeks immediate revocation of blanket prohibitory orders against Metro and railway operations.

It also seeks a strictly regulated operating schedule with immediate public notice.

The Supreme Court said on October 9 that an entire city cannot be shut down because of protests.

It said that restrictions must be proportionate and that authorities must issue a traffic advisory and give due publicity to their decisions.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had defended the measures as meant to maintain law and order.

On October 10, entry and exit were limited at 45 Metro stations until 6 pm, and mobile internet was cut near Kartavya Path, according to Careerindia.

Supreme Court of India (file image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Share this story

Follow Daily Viewer on InstagramBreaking news, explainers and stories in your feed.

Follow

Dailyviewer

Dailyviewer writes for Daily Viewer on news, explainers and current affairs from India and around the world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Law

More from Daily ViewerHome ›